• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

Cronyism stifles Iran's economy, ex-minister says

Feb 26, 2025, 13:47 GMT+0Updated: 21:53 GMT+0
A security person stands in front of the Mahshahr petrochemical plant in Khuzestan province, September 28, 2011.
A security person stands in front of the Mahshahr petrochemical plant in Khuzestan province, September 28, 2011.

Iran’s former communications minister has sharply criticized the government-controlled economy, arguing that a system favoring insiders stifles creativity and productivity.

“The reality is that in an economy built on rent-seeking, where wealth depends on political connections, creativity has no place,” Mohammad-Javad Azari-Jahromi, who served as telecommunications minister under the Rouhani administration, told a gathering of fintech experts in Tehran.

As Iran’s oil-dependent economy has plunged into crisis over the past five years, local economists, some media outlets, and politicians have increasingly criticized the underlying system while also attributing the downturn to US sanctions.

The term “rent-seeking economy” is increasingly used in Iran to describe a system where politically influential individuals and entities secure economic privileges—such as government subsidies, lack of oversight, and market monopolies—to generate profits without contributing significantly to productivity.

A clear example is the Revolutionary Guard receiving over 30% of Iran’s crude oil for export, rather than relying solely on government budget allocations.

Jahromi implicitly referred to that when he said, “Certain entities can obtain oil under the pretext of bypassing sanctions and then decide whether or not to bring the revenue back. This approach is far easier than putting in the effort to create markets and provide services.”

The former minister explained that “In this rent-seeking environment, there is no incentive for individuals to pursue creativity. Ultimately, the system operates through intermediaries.”

Nearly all of Iran’s banks, automakers, petrochemical plants, steel producers, and various other industries are either government-owned or quasi-public, managed by a politically connected elite. Despite their inefficiency and mounting debts, these industries are deemed essential and remain heavily reliant on continuous government support.

Jahromi noted that banks use their capital to engage in the real estate sector instead of helping new industries. They also own many companies and lend money to their own enterprises instead of others.

“The economy is facing fundamental and obvious obstacles. In this situation, the workforce is migrating, and investment is scarce due to the high level of risk involved,” Jahromi said.

Most Viewed

Iran negotiators ordered to return after internal rift over Islamabad talks
1
EXCLUSIVE

Iran negotiators ordered to return after internal rift over Islamabad talks

2
ANALYSIS

US blockade enters murky phase as tankers spoof signals and buyers hesitate

3
ANALYSIS

Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth

4

US tightens financial squeeze on Iran, warns banks over oil money flows

5
ANALYSIS

US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Hardliners push Hormuz ‘red line’ as US blockade tests Iran’s leverage
    INSIGHT

    Hardliners push Hormuz ‘red line’ as US blockade tests Iran’s leverage

  • Ideology may be fading in Iran, but not in Kashmir's ‘Mini Iran'
    INSIGHT

    Ideology may be fading in Iran, but not in Kashmir's ‘Mini Iran'

  • War damage amounts to $3,000 per Iranian, with blockade set to add to losses
    INSIGHT

    War damage amounts to $3,000 per Iranian, with blockade set to add to losses

  • Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth
    ANALYSIS

    Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth

  • US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption
    ANALYSIS

    US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption

  • Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout
    INSIGHT

    Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout

•
•
•

More Stories

Lavrov brought no US message to Tehran, Iranian FM says

Feb 26, 2025, 09:14 GMT+0

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov did not deliver a message from the United States during his visit to Tehran and added that no such message was anticipated.

Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of a cabinet meeting, Araghchi also addressed Iran’s ongoing negotiations with European countries, saying that a new round of talks began in Geneva two days ago, focusing on nuclear issues and other matters.

Earlier in the day, former lawmaker Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh said on X that Lavrov came to Tehran with a message: “Russia and the United States have drawn common red lines for Iran in Riyadh."

Earlier this month, President Donald Trump announced the revitalization of sanctions under his “maximum pressure” policy. He underlined that his main demand is for Iran never to acquire nuclear weapons.

Iran, facing a serious economic crisis, needs to reach an agreement with the Trump administration if it wants to reduce or eliminate the sanctions, but Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei this month banned talks with Washington. Iranian officials insist that they will not negotiate under Trump’s pressure.

Araghchi added that discussions with Europe would continue despite their complexities, as several key questions remain unresolved.

Regarding his talks with Lavrov, Araghchi described them as extensive, covering a wide range of bilateral and regional issues.

He added that the Russian diplomat provided a detailed report on Moscow’s negotiations with Washington and other regional players.

Lavrov’s visit to Tehran sparked speculation in Iranian media about whether he is carrying a message from Washington or pushing Moscow’s own agenda at Iran’s expense.

Iranian media, analysts, and the public had closely scrutinized recent visits by high-ranking foreign officials to Tehran, including Lavrov and the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, who met with Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei last week. These visits are widely interpreted as potential mediation efforts between Tehran and Washington or as channels for delivering messages from the Trump administration.

US, Iraq discuss energy and Iran’s influence

Feb 26, 2025, 08:23 GMT+0

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shiaa al-Sudani discussed Iran’s regional influence, Iraq’s energy independence, and US business investments during a call on Tuesday, the US State Department said.

According to spokesperson Tammy Bruce, both sides emphasized the need for Iraq to reduce reliance on external energy sources, swiftly reopen the Iraq-Turkey Pipeline, and uphold contractual commitments to U.S. companies to attract further investment.

Bruce added that "the two sides also discussed reducing Iran’s malign influence and continuing efforts to prevent ISIS from resurging and destabilizing the broader region."

Iran advocates closer ties with Russia as Lavrov visits Tehran

Feb 25, 2025, 18:25 GMT+0

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tehran is committed to boosting ties with Moscow in a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Tuesday, as both powers weigh how to deal with new US President Donald Trump.

"Iran and Russia have appropriate capacities to strengthen cooperation with each other, and we are determined to strengthen the interactions between Tehran and Moscow," Pezeshkian said.

"Iran and Russia have similar views on regional issues and seek to strengthen their regional and international cooperation", he added.

Moscow was dealt a boost this month as Washington under Trump emphasized the swift ending of the war Ukraine and restoration of bilateral ties.

Tehran, mired in economic malaise, faces a trickier choice dealing with Trump, who has ruled out allowing Iran acquiring a nuclear bomb and said he wants a deal which Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has ruled out.

Pezeshkian also urged for expediting the implementation of agreements, especially a Comprehensive Strategic Agreement between the two countries.

Tehran and Moscow signed a long-term agreement in March 2001 which was initially set for a ten-year term but was extended twice, each time for five years. Despite prior discussions, similar promises to finalize a renewed treaty have remained unfulfilled.

Lavrov, who conveyed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s greetings to Pezeshkian, said: “Iran and Russia have many common interests in continuing effective regional cooperation with each other.”

In a press conference following separate discussions with Lavrov, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi ruled out direct negotiations with the United States over the country’s nuclear program.

"Regarding Iran's nuclear issue, we will move forward and coordinate our positions in cooperation with our friends in Russia and China," Araghchi said.

"Iran's position in the nuclear talks is completely clear, and we will not negotiate under pressure and sanctions. There is no possibility of direct negotiations between us and the US as long as maximum pressure is being applied in this manner," he added.

Tehran’s envoy to Moscow, Kazem Jalali, also said the discussions specifically covered the nuclear issue and joint approaches in the field.

Why is the Russian foreign minister visiting Iran now?

Feb 25, 2025, 13:14 GMT+0
•
Maryam Sinaiee

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov’s visit to Tehran has sparked speculation in Iranian media about whether he is carrying a message from Washington or pushing Moscow’s own agenda at Iran’s expense.

Tehran and Moscow say Lavrov and his Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, will discuss mutual relations, trade, and economic cooperation, as well as key international issues, including the situation in Syria, during the one-day visit.

The visit follows discussions in Ankara on Monday and comes just a week after his meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Riyadh.

Delivering a message from the United States to Iran?

Iranian media, analysts, and the public have closely scrutinized recent visits by high-ranking foreign officials to Tehran, including Lavrov and the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, who met with Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei last week. These visits are widely interpreted as potential mediation efforts between Tehran and Washington or as channels for delivering messages from the Trump administration.

A commentary published Tuesday by Iran’s official news agency, IRNA, acknowledged that the purpose of Lavrov’s visit might extend beyond the official agenda. However, it argued that many experts doubt Lavrov is carrying a direct message from the Trump administration. Instead, it suggested that Lavrov might share his assessment of Washington’s approach to Iran and relay Iran’s desired roadmap back to the US in a similar manner.

The commentary also speculated that Lavrov could be conveying Moscow’s own message to Tehran, warning against shifting Iran’s nuclear doctrine or withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), as some Iranian ultra-hardliners advocate.

Speaking to the reformist Etemad daily, foreign policy analyst Abdolreza Faraji-Rad cast doubt on the likelihood of Lavrov delivering a direct US message to Tehran.

If such a message were being conveyed, he suggested it might involve Washington offering a temporary reduction in “maximum pressure” sanctions—reimposed by Trump’s executive order on January 20—in exchange for Iran agreeing to direct negotiations over its nuclear program.

Others suggested that Lavrov is simply planning to inform the Islamic Republic about its changing relations with the Trump administration and Ukraine negotiations.

Concerns about Iran being used by Russia as a bargaining chip

Some Iranian media and analysts warned that Iran could be betrayed by Russia and become a bargaining chip in potential negotiations between the Trump and Putin administrations, particularly regarding the Ukraine conflict.

A commentary published Tuesday by Khabar Online, a news outlet close to former conservative Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani, compared Lavrov’s recent meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and the planned Trump-Putin meeting compared by some to the Yalta Conference of February 1945, which reshaped global geopolitics. The article warned that “Iran is also in danger.”

Khabar Online also quoted former chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh, who argued that Iran is merely a bargaining chip in these negotiations. “I am concerned that Iran may be sacrificed for peace [in Ukraine],” he stated.

Reza Taghizadeh, a Glasgow-based Iranian political commentator, echoed similar concerns on X, speculating that “Lavrov's goal in Tehran is to convince the Islamic Republic to surrender its nuclear program and disband the ‘axis of resistance’ in exchange for avoiding an Israeli military attack and blocking [its] oil exports! … Are the Russians securing [concessions from the US over] Ukraine while offering up Iran [in return]?”

Pezeshkian under fire for boosting funding to propaganda institutions

Feb 25, 2025, 12:39 GMT+0
•
Maryam Sinaiee

Iranian media outlets and public figures are criticizing Tehran’s proposed budget for allocating substantial funds to the state-run Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) and religious institutions.

Critics saw the allocation of the 350 trillion rials (approximately $400 million) for IRIB as most contentious, noting an increase of 33% compared to last year.

This budget surpasses the combined allocations for several key ministries, including Oil, Foreign Affairs, Cultural Heritage, and Justice.

The $400 million allocation for IRIB would have been $800 million if not for the currency’s sharp devaluation.

In a commentary published by Etemad on Monday, prominent reformist commentator Abbas Abdi sharply criticized Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian for increasing IRIB’s budget.

“What is the government’s justification for financing this inefficient institution? … Why should the public bear the cost of the state television’s revenue decline from advertising?” Abdi wrote, arguing that the drop in revenue is due to a shrinking audience.

IRIB, now dominated by ultra-hardliners aligned with the Paydari Party, offers limited entertainment, instead focusing on religious and political messaging.

Observers also point out that viewers have increasingly turned to foreign-based satellite channels, particularly Persian-language channels, and domestic video-on-demand platforms.

While IRIB claims a 72% viewership, a survey by the state-affiliated Iranian Students Polling Agency (ISPA) indicates a sharp decline. According to ISPA, only 12.5% of respondents now consider IRIB their primary news source, down from 51% in 2017.

Over the past years, the broadcaster has been sanctioned by many Western governments for its role in state propaganda, censorship, and broadcasting forced confessions.

Controversial funding for religious institutions

Beyond IRIB, the increased funding for state-run Islamic propaganda organizations and so-called "cultural institutions" has also sparked backlash. These organizations, which receive tens of millions of dollars in government funding, operate with little transparency and are not subject to government oversight.

Among them is an organization responsible for promoting group prayers in government offices, schools, and universities. Another is tasked with enforcing Islamic obligations, such as wearing the hijab and fasting, while discouraging what it deems sinful behavior.

Other recipients include the Qom-based Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute founded by the late Ayatollah Mohammad-Taghi Mesbah-Yazdi, often considered the spiritual father of the Islamic Republic's ultraconservatives, and Al-Mustafa International University in Qom that has branches in over fifty countries and sponsors hundreds of students annually, from China to Africa and Latin America, to study in Iran.

Many critics question the necessity of such expenditures at a time when the country faces severe economic challenges.

"Why is it necessary to spend so much money on foreign seminary students in a country where nearly a million students have dropped out of school mainly due to poverty," journalist Mohammad Parsi wrote on X.

Calls for budget revisions

Speaking to Entekhab last week, former moderate conservative lawmaker Jalal Rashidi Kouchi urged the Pezeshkian to eliminate funding for these institutions, arguing that these have “no [observable] achievement other than fueling public resentment toward the government.”

The government recently submitted the second part of its budget bill to parliament, detailing allocations to IRIB and these controversial cultural institutions. Lawmakers are currently reviewing the bill and must approve it before the Iranian New Year (Norouz) on March 20.

Economic challenges ahead

One of the biggest challenges facing Pezeshkian’s administration—exacerbated by an expected decline in oil exports, Iran’s primary source of revenue—is a growing budget deficit and inflation surpassing 40 percent. The situation has deteriorated further following US President Donald Trump’s recent reinstatement of his "maximum pressure" policy against Iran.

As the budget debate continues and food and commodity prices surge ahead of the Persian New Year, public scrutiny over government spending on propaganda and religious institutions is expected to grow.

According to in-house analysts, the hardline-dominated Parliament is not likely to yield to such concerns and may even approve further increases for some propaganda organizations.