• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

Calls for US talks grow as Khamenei adviser urges 'maximum patience'

Behrouz Turani
Behrouz Turani

Iran International

Feb 28, 2025, 13:50 GMT+0Updated: 15:29 GMT+0
US President Donald Trump in the White House. File photo
US President Donald Trump in the White House. File photo

While a senior adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader rejected talks with the United States and urged Iranians to exercise "maximum patience" in response to US "maximum pressure," others called for restraint and diplomacy.

The diversity of views suggests the ruling establishment has yet to either decisively welcome or reject US President Donald Trump's overture for diplomacy.

Iranian media quoted Kamal Kharrazi, chairman of the Strategic Council of Foreign Relations that advises Ayatollah Khamenei, as saying to Iraq's al-Yum newspaper that "US and Israel's pressure will not stop Iran's nuclear program" and ruled out negotiations with Washington "as long as America's unilateralism" continues.

At the congress of the Reformist Mardom Salari Party on the same day, Jalil Rahimi Jahanabadi criticized the government's and parliament’s decision-making, saying it has not solved any problem. He urged Tehran to "avoid challenging regional and global powers, as this can be costly for Iran."

He explained that "Trump has questioned all the democratic standards of the West and we need to run the country's affairs in this situation."

Meanwhile, he warned Iran's hardliners against challenging President Masoud Pezeshkian, cautioning that "if he is undermined, there will be no one left to address the country's problems."

In a separate development on the same day, prominent Reformist Behzad Nabavi cautioned the government that "Iran's economic situation is dire, and the country cannot afford to delay negotiations with the United States for another four years" until Trump leaves the White House.

However, according to the Iranian Labor News Agency (ILNA), Nabavi acknowledged that while Iran's economic crisis requires urgent action, Tehran cannot rush into negotiations with Trump.

He proposed that Iran should first engage in talks with Europe to gradually ease the sanctions that have devastated the economy. "At the same time, we need to reach a cease-fire with the United States," ILNA quoted him as saying. However, he did not specify what Europe could offer Iran or how Tehran could persuade Trump to wait until it is ready for negotiations.

President Donald Trump reinstated his “maximum pressure” sanctions on Iran in February, demanding a deal that would permanently prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

However, Nabavi noted that a short-term solution for Iran's problems requires lifting the sanctions, but if that is not possible Tehran should resort to rationing foodstuff and essential commodities to limit the impact of sanctions.

As Iran’s currency has fallen by around 50% since September, prices of essential necessities have skyrocketed in recent weeks and more inflation is expected in the coming months. The overall consensus in the Iranian media is that the country faces harsh challenges and the government seems unable to find more money to finance imports.

In a related development, conservative daily Jomhouri Eslami cautioned Iranian officials against trusting Russia.

Following Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's visit to Tehran, the newspaper warned, "We cannot make yet another mistake. Do not trust Russia!"

The daily argued that it would be a mistake for Iran's foreign ministry to trust a foreign power that "has proven unreliable" in past experiences, including during nuclear negotiations, the Ukraine war, Syria before Assad's fall, and disputes over Iran's ownership of three Persian Gulf islands.

Jomhouri Eslami suggested that contrary to official statements, Lavrov's visit was linked to a major deal between the United States and Russia and could impact the future of Iran-US relations.

The editorial also criticized Iran's state-run news agencies for their "misleading reporting practices," accusing them of focusing on irrelevant details rather than the substantive outcomes of talks with foreign officials. It warned that this approach "erodes public trust in Iranian media" and drives audiences to seek news about Iran from foreign outlets, calling this shift "a significant loss."

Most Viewed

Iran negotiators ordered to return after internal rift over Islamabad talks
1
EXCLUSIVE

Iran negotiators ordered to return after internal rift over Islamabad talks

2
ANALYSIS

US blockade enters murky phase as tankers spoof signals and buyers hesitate

3
ANALYSIS

Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth

4

US tightens financial squeeze on Iran, warns banks over oil money flows

5
ANALYSIS

US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Hardliners push Hormuz ‘red line’ as US blockade tests Iran’s leverage
    INSIGHT

    Hardliners push Hormuz ‘red line’ as US blockade tests Iran’s leverage

  • Ideology may be fading in Iran, but not in Kashmir's ‘Mini Iran'
    INSIGHT

    Ideology may be fading in Iran, but not in Kashmir's ‘Mini Iran'

  • War damage amounts to $3,000 per Iranian, with blockade set to add to losses
    INSIGHT

    War damage amounts to $3,000 per Iranian, with blockade set to add to losses

  • Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth
    ANALYSIS

    Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth

  • US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption
    ANALYSIS

    US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption

  • Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout
    INSIGHT

    Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout

•
•
•

More Stories

Why Khamenei’s clerics look for the crescent moon on Friday

Feb 28, 2025, 09:30 GMT+0
•
Maryam Sinaiee

Hundreds of Iranian clerics will scan the skies with binoculars on Friday evening, perched atop hills or aboard airplanes, with a single mission: to report the sighting of the crescent moon to the country's Supreme Leader.

Ali Khamenei will use reports of the new crescent moon sighting—hilal in Arabic—from various regions of the country on Friday or Saturday to determine the start date of this year’s Islamic fasting month of Ramadan.

According to Kazem Kukaram, spokesperson for Iran's Amateur Astronomy Society, the chances of spotting the crescent moon on Friday evening are slim.

Given its position in the sky, the moon will be visible for only about fifteen minutes after sunset—weather permitting. As a result, Ramadan is unlikely to start on Saturday, meaning Sunday will most likely mark the beginning of the holy month.

Shia grand ayatollahs, both in Iran and abroad, traditionally insist that the crescent moon must be sighted with the naked eye for the observation to be considered valid.

Yet, Khamenei and other grand ayatollahs allow the use of binoculars and other simple optical devices for moon-sighting, diverging from traditional Shia practice, which rejects modern astronomical calculations and advanced telescopes in determining the lunar calendar.

Khamenei’s special taskforce

Since becoming the Islamic Republic's Supreme Leader in 1989, Khamenei has maintained a dedicated moon-sighting taskforce.

Initially composed of 700 members in 150 groups, this year’s reports indicate that 100 groups have been deployed across the country.

Taskforce members, primarily clerics well-versed in Islamic moon-sighting criteria, will repeat this process at the end of Ramadan to determine the holiday of Eid al-Fitr.

The official declaration of Eid and Khamenei's customary sermon during Eid prayers in Tehran are broadcast on state-run radio and television.

However, disagreements occasionally occur. The most notable recent instance was in May 2020, when several grand ayatollahs, using their own criteria, declared a different date for Eid. This resulted in multiple separate Eid prayers instead of a unified, state-sponsored gathering.

In recent years, there has reportedly been pressure on other grand ayatollahs to follow Khamenei's lead on the matter of beginning and end of Ramadan to reinforce the Supreme Leader's religious and political authority. 

The impact of Ramadan on daily life in Iran

While some people fast from dawn to dusk, others must be careful not to break the fasting month regulations, including a ban on eating, drinking, and smoking in all public spaces, including inside private vehicles, even if they are exempted from fasting by medical or other reasons.

Law enforcement agencies strictly enforce these rules, with violators facing penalties ranging from 10 days to two months in prison or up to 74 lashes under Iran’s Islamic Penal Code.

Restaurants, cafes, and street vendors are barred from serving customers before sunset. Businesses that fail to comply face serious consequences including temporary closure and cash fines. Some establishments have been allowed to discreetly offer take-away food over the last years.

Ramadan and Norouz holidays coincide

As in the past two years, Ramadan will partly coincide with the ancient Iranian New Year holidays—Norouz in Persian.

This overlap occurs because Iran follows a solar calendar, while the Islamic calendar is lunar and approximately ten days shorter each year.

In recent times, many ordinary Iranians have been deeply impacted by severe economic hardship. The overlap of Ramadan and Norouz is expected to further strain the hospitality industry and other businesses, many of which are already on the brink of bankruptcy due to a sharp decline in people's ability to afford travel and dining out during the Norouz holidays.

Iranian president’s popularity waning, warns commentator

Feb 28, 2025, 06:48 GMT+0
•
Behrouz Turani

Ahmad Zeidabadi, prominent commentator close to the Reformist camp in Tehran, has raised the alarm that President Masoud Pezeshkian's popularity is declining and that is dangerous for the country.

Zeidabadi's remarks came after Pezeshkian reaffirmed his commitment to the promises he made during his June 2024 election campaign. Pezeshkian frequently repeats this claim when confronted with accusations of breaking or neglecting his promises.

The commentator remarked, “Pezeshkian explicitly promised to lift sanctions on Iran, guarantee social liberties, and end the ban on social media. He now needs to clarify which of these promises he still stands by.”

Although Pezeshkian has consistently advocated for negotiations with President Donald Trump’s administration, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei prohibited such talks in early February. As a result, Pezeshkian aligned with this stance, stating that negotiating with Trump is not a realistic option.

He added: "When I talk with the people, I realize that Pezeshkian's popularity is declining and those who had voted for him feel frustrated. We have not seen any initiative from him for a long time now, and this is dangerous for him and the country."

Earlier, Iranian media on both ends of the country's political spectrum had summed up what Pezeshkian had promised to voters.

Mehr News Agency, affiliated with conservative clerics, highlighted that Pezeshkian made 10 promises to revive Iran's struggling economy. These included preventing gasoline price hikes, stabilizing the stock exchange, reducing inflation, addressing deteriorating living standards, establishing a unified exchange rate, permitting the import of foreign vehicles, and promoting social justice.

Mehr also highlighted Pezeshkian’s promise to guarantee freedom and dignity for Iranian women. He had stated, “Just as pre-1979 governments failed to eliminate the hijab, we cannot impose it on women.” However, mandatory hijab remains a deeply contentious social and political issue in Iran.

Even Reformist newspaper Etemad, which backs the president, drew attention to Pezeshkian’s economic promises under six key areas: dismantling the centralized government-controlled economy, opening up to international trade and diversifying trading partners, combating economic cronyism and ending special privileges for the well-connected, fostering a competitive market, enhancing living standards, and supporting the stock exchange to encourage public participation in the economy.

Other media outlets also highlighted Pezeshkian’s civil rights promises, including protecting women from harassment by hijab enforcers, promoting women to key government positions, ending government censorship of the internet and social media, safeguarding university students and professors from dismissal, allowing Sunni Muslims to hold top positions, encouraging political participation by ethnic minorities, lifting censorship on books and the press, and combating discrimination and injustice.

Critics have increasingly pointed out that most of Pezeshkian's promises remain unfulfilled, with minimal progress on key issues such as the hijab and internet censorship.

For example, Zeidabadi noted that while the controversial Hijab Enforcement Bill has been suspended, it has not been fully abolished.

Meanwhile, addressing remarks from both critics and supporters who argue that resolving Iran’s nuclear and other disputes with the United States is essential for tackling the economic crisis, Zeidabadi urged Pezeshkian to clarify his stance. He asked, “If negotiating and reaching a deal with Trump is impossible, then what is your alternative solution?”

The commentator also criticized Pezeshkian’s administration for its lack of strategy and decisiveness, questioning, “If the government lacks the authority to address these issues, why should it continue to exist?”

British PM tells Trump Ukraine peace deal must not reward Iran

Feb 27, 2025, 20:59 GMT+0

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer warned that any peace agreement on Ukraine must not embolden Iran in a joint press conference with US President Donald Trump in Washington on Thursday.

"We have to win the peace," Starmer said. "And that's what we must do now. Because it can't be peace that rewards the aggressor or that gives encouragement to regimes like Iran. We agree history must be on the side of the peacemaker, not the invader. So the stakes, they couldn't be higher."

Trump, speaking alongside Starmer, said it was necessary to secure a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine.

The visit comes ahead of Trump's meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky slated for Friday.

On Sunday, Zelensky said Russia launched 267 attack drones on Ukraine, marking the largest single assault since the use of Iranian-made projectiles began following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

"On the eve of the third anniversary of the full-scale war, Russia launched 267 attack drones against Ukraine—the largest attack since Iranian drones began striking Ukrainian cities and villages," he said in a post on X.

On Wednesday, the US Treasury levied sanctions on six entities in Hong Kong and mainland China it said facilitate the acquisition of parts for armed drones produced by Iran, as part of Washington's "maximum pressure" campaign on Tehran.

“Iran continues to try to find new ways to procure the key components it needs to bolster its UAV weapons program through new front companies and third-country suppliers,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement on Wednesday, referring to unmanned aerial vehicles.

The US state department said Washington was determined to thwart the program.

"These programs produce missiles and drones that Iran uses against our allies and exports to its terror proxy groups and Russia," it said in a statement.

Iranian drones have repeatedly been deployed in attacks on Ukraine’s infrastructure and other civilian targets. The Shahed 136 drone is typically launched alongside cruise and ballistic missile attacks to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses.

US bill urges EU to list Iran's Revolutionary Guards as terrorist group

Feb 27, 2025, 17:40 GMT+0

Two US lawmakers introduced a bipartisan bill urging the European Union to list Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization to present a united Western front against Tehran's military operations in the Middle East.

The Revolutionary Guards are a paramilitary and intelligence organization which helps arms and trains Shi'ite armed groups in the region.

US President Donald Trump designated the IRGC a terrorist organization in 2019 and ordered the assassination of its commander Qassem Soleimani in a drone strike in Baghdad the next year.

The European Union has so far held off on such a designation for the IRGC as a whole though it has designated individuals in the organization. None of the EU member states list it as a terrorist organization.

"To defeat the IRGC, which is responsible for sponsoring terrorist attacks against innocent civilians across the globe, the United States cannot act alone," congresswoman Claudia Tenney, a co-sponsor of the so-called Encouraging the EU to DESIGNATE Resolution, said in a statement.

"It's time for our EU allies to step up and follow suit .. this will send a strong message that the West is united against the IRGC's malicious actions and that we will hold them accountable for their vile acts of terrorism," the New York Republican added.

The EU has designated the Palestinian armed movement Hamas and the military wing of Lebanese Hezbollah terrorist organizations. Both groups, along with the Houthi group in Yemen and various militias in Iraq are backed by IRGC.

A full terrorism designation imposed on the IRGC would enable European law enforcement greater police and investigatory powers to prosecute Iranian officials and organizations.

The classification could also have profound dent European-Iran trade relations, as the IRGC controls a large portion of the Islamic Republic's economy.

“With Tehran more isolated than ever, now is the time to tighten the screws— we must not ease up or give the IRGC room to regroup," congressman Brad Schneider said.

"The US and Canada have already acted, and I urge our European allies to join us," the Illinois democrat said.

75% of US voters want Iran’s potential nuclear weapons sites destroyed - poll

Feb 27, 2025, 08:44 GMT+0

More than 75% of registered voters in a Harvard-Harris poll said Iran’s “nuclear weapons facilities” should be destroyed, while over half support Israeli strikes to achieve that goal.

While the Trump administration has promised "maximum pressure" on Iran, saying the Islamic Republic cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons, 72% of the Democrat voters and 82% of Republicans opted in the poll "to destroy Iran's nuclear weapons facilities."

The poll’s wording assumed that Iran possesses nuclear weapons and did not specify which of Iran’s nuclear facilities are being used for weapons production.

Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons and the United States last publicly assessed that Tehran's enrichment levels aimed to give it the ability to rapidly build a bomb but it had not yet chosen to do so.

When asked if the US should support Israel in airstrikes these facilities, 57% overall said yes, 45% of Democrats and 74% of Republicans.

The IAEA has not confirmed that Iran's current nuclear program has a military aspect. However, it has previously raised concerns about Iran’s pre-2003 nuclear weapons activities and more recent tensions over uranium enrichment approaching weapons-grade levels.

Despite concerns over undeclared nuclear materials and Iran’s lack of full cooperation, no official UN or IAEA report states that Iran is actively developing a nuclear weapon today.

The February survey was carried out on 2,443 registered voters, the results gauging public opinion, with an overwhelming majority showing a massive approval rating for the second term of President Donald Trump.

While Trump has promised a policy of ‘maximum pressure’ on Iran, he has also made clear his preference for diplomatic channels over military.

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Tuesday: ”Iran's position in the nuclear talks is completely clear, and we will not negotiate under pressure and sanctions.

"There is no possibility of direct negotiations between us and the US as long as maximum pressure is being applied in this manner.”

In 2018, during his first term, Trump pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA, and imposed 'maximum pressure' sanctions on Tehran, practically reducing Iran’s oil exports to less than 500,000 barrels per day and blocking the revenues in foreign banks.

Last month, Trump said he hoped a new deal over Iran's nuclear program meant the United States would not have to support an Israeli attack on Iran.

"It would really be nice if that could be worked out without having to go that further step ... Iran hopefully will make a deal, and if they don't make a deal, I guess that's okay too,” he said during a press conference at the Oval.

However, this week, Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa’ar has warned that a military option to stop Iran gaining nuclear weapons may be the only way forward.

Speaking to POLITICO, he said “we don't have much time". Only last year, the UN’s nuclear chief, Rafael Grossi, warned that Iran was “weeks not months” from a nuclear weapon.

"I think that in order to stop a nuclear Iranian program before it will be weaponized, a reliable military option should be on the table," Sa’ar said, as Iran has already enriched enough uranium for what he said was “a couple of bombs”.