• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

IAEA sees rise in Iran uranium stock to enough for six nuclear bombs - Reuters

Feb 26, 2025, 16:41 GMT+0
A general view of the Bushehr main nuclear reactor, 1,200 km (746 miles) south of Tehran, August 21, 2010.
A general view of the Bushehr main nuclear reactor, 1,200 km (746 miles) south of Tehran, August 21, 2010.

The UN nuclear watchdog has found that Iran's stock of near-bomb-grade uranium has risen to levels which in principle could be refined further into the equivalent of six nuclear bombs, Reuters reported citing confidential IAEA reports.

Iran's stock of uranium enriched to near weapons grade has grown sharply even after a previous rise Tehran announced in December, two confidential reports by the International Atomic Energy Agency cited by the news agency found.

No progress has been made toward resolving the disputed program, the reports added, according to Reuters.

"The significantly increased production and accumulation of high enriched uranium by Iran, the only non-nuclear weapon state to produce such nuclear material, is of serious concern," the IAEA said in both reports.

Iran's has enriched of uranium to up to 60% fissile purity, closer to the 90% needed for a bomb. Tehran denies seeking a bomb but the United States, Israel and Western powers doubt its intentions.

Iran's uranium stock refined to up to 60% grew by 92.5 kilograms (kg) in the past quarter to 274.8 kg, one of the IAEA reports said. According to an IAEA yardstick, the amount is enough in principle for six nuclear bombs if enriched further.

"Iran states that it has declared all of the nuclear material, activities and locations required under its Safeguards Agreement. This is inconsistent with the Agency's assessments of the unexplained nuclear-related activities that took place at all four of the undeclared locations in Iran referred to above," one of the reports said.

The IAEA has for years been seeking explanations from Tehran about uranium traces at nuclear sites and other issues.

'The matter is political"

Earlier on Wednesday, Iran dismissed public concerns raised by IAEA over its nuclear program, with the country's nuclear chief accusing the agency of politicizing technical matters.

"The agency has received the answers to the safeguards questions, but there is a political will not to accept them," said Mohammad Eslami, head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization.

"When the Director General of the Agency says that Iran should resolve its issues with Trump, it means the matter is political, not technical."

Speaking after a cabinet meeting on Wednesday, Eslami described Iran’s nuclear facilities as resilient against external threats.

"Threats to the country's nuclear industry have always existed," he told reporters. "Today and tomorrow, a nuclear defense exercise will be held at nuclear facilities. Iran is more resilient than the enemy imagines, and our infrastructure is not vulnerable."

Iran’s nuclear program remains a focal point of international tensions, particularly following Washington’s withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal and the imposition of economic sanctions.

While Tehran has reduced IAEA inspections since 2021, it continues to argue that its nuclear activities are peaceful. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi recently said the UN body was willing to assist Iran in proving it was not seeking nuclear weapons.

"We want to make ourselves available, providing technically sound alternatives to eliminate the possibility that Iran develops a nuclear weapon, to prevent Iran, or to help Iran prove that they don't want to develop a nuclear weapon," Grossi told reporters in Tokyo.

The United States, meanwhile, has reinstated its "maximum pressure" policy on Iran, with President Donald Trump insisting that Tehran must never acquire nuclear weapons.

Most Viewed

Iran negotiators ordered to return after internal rift over Islamabad talks
1
EXCLUSIVE

Iran negotiators ordered to return after internal rift over Islamabad talks

2
INSIGHT

Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout

3
ANALYSIS

US blockade enters murky phase as tankers spoof signals and buyers hesitate

4
ANALYSIS

Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth

5

US tightens financial squeeze on Iran, warns banks over oil money flows

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Hardliners push Hormuz ‘red line’ as US blockade tests Iran’s leverage
    INSIGHT

    Hardliners push Hormuz ‘red line’ as US blockade tests Iran’s leverage

  • Ideology may be fading in Iran, but not in Kashmir's ‘Mini Iran'
    INSIGHT

    Ideology may be fading in Iran, but not in Kashmir's ‘Mini Iran'

  • War damage amounts to $3,000 per Iranian, with blockade set to add to losses
    INSIGHT

    War damage amounts to $3,000 per Iranian, with blockade set to add to losses

  • Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth
    ANALYSIS

    Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth

  • US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption
    ANALYSIS

    US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption

  • Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout
    INSIGHT

    Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout

•
•
•

More Stories

Israeli FM warns of ‘military option’ to prevent Iran going nuclear - Politico

Feb 26, 2025, 11:31 GMT+0

Israel’s foreign minister has warned that time is running out to stop Iran gaining a nuclear weapon and military action must be considered, according to Politico.

“We don't have much time," Gideon Sa’ar told the publication.

"I think that in order to stop a nuclear Iranian program before it will be weaponized, a reliable military option should be on the table," he said, as Iran has already enriched enough uranium for what he said was “a couple of bombs”.

It comes while US President Donald Trump is exerting maximum pressure on Tehran to bring about a deal in his second term.

Sa’ar said that diplomatic options were optimal but the chances of success are not huge, adding that a nuclear Iran would be a “catastrophe for the security of Israel”, with Iran’s nuclear capabilities possibly triggering a nuclear race in the region with Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The foreign minister’s comments follow strong words from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he will end Iran’s nuclear ambitions alongside the US president. “Over the last 16 months, Israel has dealt a mighty blow to Iran’s terror axis. Under the strong leadership of President Trump… I have no doubt that we can and will finish the job,” Netanyahu said.

However, Trump has made clear that a diplomatic solution was the first course of action, instead of "bombing the hell out of it" while his security adviser, Mike Waltz, said all options are currently on the table in order to totally disable Tehran's nuclear program.

Iran's intelligence minister said on Saturday that Iran is a peace-seeking nation, while warning the US and Israel against action against its nuclear sites.

“The Iranian nation is peace-seeking and has no enmity with any country,” Esmail Khatib said.

“However, in the face of adventurism, malicious actions, and unwarranted interference—particularly from the US and the Zionist regime—we will adhere to the strategy of threat for threat and aggression for aggression.”

Most recently, Israel has been battling a new Iran threat in the occupied West Bank, where Tehran has been funnelling weapons and funds via Jordan to its allies such as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

"We are now confronting a huge attempt by Iran via money and weapons that are floating to what you call the West Bank," Sa’ar said, as Iran continues to "inflame these territories” amid Israel’s fragile ceasefire with Iran’s allies Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

On Sunday, Israel's defense minister announced that its war on Iran-backed groups in the West Bank could go on as long as another year, with at least 40,000 people now displaced amid the fighting.

Speaking about the operation named Iron Wall, Defense Minister Israel Katz said: "We will not return to the reality that existed in the past.

"We will continue to clear refugee camps and other terrorist hotbeds in order to dismantle the battalions and terrorist infrastructures of extremist Islam that were built, armed, financed and trained by the Iranian axis of evil."

Iran urges Europe, IAEA to resist US pressure on nuclear issue

Feb 26, 2025, 08:50 GMT+0

The Iranian government published a detailed public letter alleging that Europe and the International Atomic Energy Agency are under pressure from the US to be tougher on Iran.

The unsigned 2,000 word article on the government's news website, IRNA, argued that the postponement of a meeting of European foreign ministers with Iran and critical remarks made by the head of IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, shows pressure from Washington.

“Has Europe once again settled into the safe zone of inaction, completing Donald Trump's puzzle and allowing him to dominate the scene?", the article said.

European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Monday that a planned ministers-only discussion on Iran was postponed due to the absence of key foreign ministers.

“On Iran, we were supposed to have discussions, ministers-only format, regarding Iran today but because very important foreign ministers were missing, so we postponed this,” Kallas said.

IRNA accused Europe and the IAEA of making contradictory statements about Iran’s nuclear program, arguing that Tehran has the right to unlimited uranium enrichment, as international conventions do not prohibit it. The article also blamed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for orchestrating international opposition to Iran.

The article then went on to suggest “confidence building” measures between Europe, the IAEA and Iran, acknowledging that for three decades the two sides have spelled out their positions.

“The JCPOA formula offers the most cost-effective and efficient way to build trust," the letter on IRNA stated, while many consider the deal outdated and even dead.

"Through a series of strategic calculations and negotiations among the parties involved, the 2015 JCPOA became one of the most significant agreements of the past century. These dynamics can be replicated if the European Union abandons its outdated carrot-and-stick approach and engages in transparent dialogue," it added.

Last week, amid Iran's continued denials of building a nuclear weapon, the IAEA chief said the UN body was prepared to help Iran prove it did not seek nuclear weapons.

"We want to make ourselves available, providing technically sound alternatives to eliminate the possibility that Iran develops a nuclear weapon, to prevent Iran, or to help Iran prove that they don't want to develop a nuclear weapon," Rafael Grossi told reporters at Japan’s National Press Club.

However, only last year, Grossi warned that Iran, which has limited IAEA inspections of its nuclear facilities since 2021, was "weeks not months" away from a nuclear weapon.

Trump withdrew from the 2015 JCPOA nuclear agreement in May 2018, calling it a bad deal and demanding more concessions from Tehran. He then imposed strict economic sanctions, which the Biden administration was accused of not fully enforcing.

However, earlier this month, the US president announced the revitalization of these sanctions under his “maximum pressure” policy. He underlined that his main demand is for Iran never to acquire nuclear weapons.

Iran, facing a serious economic crisis, needs to reach an agreement with the Trump administration if it wants to reduce or eliminate the sanctions, but its Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei this month banned talks with Washington.

Iranian officials insist that they will not negotiate under Trump’s pressure.

Khamenei defies Trump pressure, but will he hold the line?

Feb 25, 2025, 20:02 GMT+0
•
Ali Afshari

Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei has ruled out talks with the United States despite President Donald Trump’s threat to zero Iranian oil exports, but is Khamenei’s stance final?

Looking from afar, it appears that Khamenei is banking on what he perceives as resilience of the Islamic Republic—the system, as he usually calls it.

If the system can withstand the storm, there may be a chance to negotiate in circumstances less treacherous and toward terms more favorable.

A historical overview could be enlightening.

The 2015 nuclear deal, officially named the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), was presented as a diplomatic breakthrough by all sides involved. It only came through, however, after heavy sanctions by the United Nations and the US under Barack Obama.

Khamenei reluctantly allowed talks, first secretly then publicly, calling it "heroic flexibility", and eventually nodded through the ensuing agreement, essentially accepting a halt to Iran’s nuclear activities while preserving the nuclear infrastructure.

But how should we read Khamenei's opposition this time? Is he truly and absolutely, as he claims, against negotiating with Trump?

His history of dual positioning suggests otherwise.

Saving the system at all costs

Contrary to the prevailing narrative, Khamenei’s opposition to a potential detente with Washington is not absolute.

He may not authorize talks if he believes sanctions, even tightened ones, are not detrimental to his system’s survival, or if he thinks other world powers could throw him a lifeline.

But what if he sees no such sign of relief on the horizon?

The Islamic Republic is arguably in a weaker position now than it has ever been, both internally and externally, with no clear outlook for a revival of the Resistance Front of armed allies in the region that it all but lost in the past year.

This reality may compel Khamenei to allow talks as much as it could force him not to, since he wants to negotiate from a position of power. In short, the unfavorable circumstances call for negotiations but the terms of the potential agreement forbid it.

It is Catch-22. What is to be done if you perceive the concessions required of you in an agreement as existentially threatening as refusing to negotiate in the first place?

Flexing over the fence

Khamenei’s answer to that question appears to come in two parts, either limited but aggressive confrontations, or, dialogue through intermediaries. The aim is to alter the conditions of negotiation or muddle through Trump’s second term.

Iran’s supreme leader will not hesitate to announce a variation on the theme of heroic flexibility, If circumstances align with his expectations.

If Khamenei were entirely opposed to negotiations, he would have fully withdrawn from the JCPOA and escalated into full confrontation. Instead, he has halted further uranium enrichment and adopted a defensive regional stance to strengthen his bargaining position and shift negotiation conditions in his favor.

Turning to domestic power dynamics, all factions appear to be singing from the Khamenei sheet, rejecting Trump’s proposal for talks.

Even then, the hardline principalists continue to criticize the relatively moderate administration of Masoud Pezeshkian because while the president himself is fully in line, some figures close to him utter out-of-line views from time to time.

The hardliners—and Khamenei himself—reject the moderates’ de-escalation and diplomacy as strategic solutions. They will keep doing so until they hit an impasse or arrive at waters calmer for roundtable.

In their view, hard power, including the now diminished Resistance, is the country’s primary tool in dealing with external pressure.

It is also imperative to national security. The continued attacks on Pezeshkian aim to prevent him from politically capitalizing on the situation and enhancing the moderates’ position within the system.

Khamenei would likely carry on sitting on the fence, ruling out talks with Trump in words but not deeds. Even in words, Iran’s supreme leader has been markedly measured when talking about the US president.

The Supreme Leader knows, better than everybody perhaps, that he may need to change tack at any moment.

Iran advocates closer ties with Russia as Lavrov visits Tehran

Feb 25, 2025, 18:25 GMT+0

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tehran is committed to boosting ties with Moscow in a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Tuesday, as both powers weigh how to deal with new US President Donald Trump.

"Iran and Russia have appropriate capacities to strengthen cooperation with each other, and we are determined to strengthen the interactions between Tehran and Moscow," Pezeshkian said.

"Iran and Russia have similar views on regional issues and seek to strengthen their regional and international cooperation", he added.

Moscow was dealt a boost this month as Washington under Trump emphasized the swift ending of the war Ukraine and restoration of bilateral ties.

Tehran, mired in economic malaise, faces a trickier choice dealing with Trump, who has ruled out allowing Iran acquiring a nuclear bomb and said he wants a deal which Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has ruled out.

Pezeshkian also urged for expediting the implementation of agreements, especially a Comprehensive Strategic Agreement between the two countries.

Tehran and Moscow signed a long-term agreement in March 2001 which was initially set for a ten-year term but was extended twice, each time for five years. Despite prior discussions, similar promises to finalize a renewed treaty have remained unfulfilled.

Lavrov, who conveyed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s greetings to Pezeshkian, said: “Iran and Russia have many common interests in continuing effective regional cooperation with each other.”

In a press conference following separate discussions with Lavrov, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi ruled out direct negotiations with the United States over the country’s nuclear program.

"Regarding Iran's nuclear issue, we will move forward and coordinate our positions in cooperation with our friends in Russia and China," Araghchi said.

"Iran's position in the nuclear talks is completely clear, and we will not negotiate under pressure and sanctions. There is no possibility of direct negotiations between us and the US as long as maximum pressure is being applied in this manner," he added.

Tehran’s envoy to Moscow, Kazem Jalali, also said the discussions specifically covered the nuclear issue and joint approaches in the field.

Why is the Russian foreign minister visiting Iran now?

Feb 25, 2025, 13:14 GMT+0
•
Maryam Sinaiee

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov’s visit to Tehran has sparked speculation in Iranian media about whether he is carrying a message from Washington or pushing Moscow’s own agenda at Iran’s expense.

Tehran and Moscow say Lavrov and his Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, will discuss mutual relations, trade, and economic cooperation, as well as key international issues, including the situation in Syria, during the one-day visit.

The visit follows discussions in Ankara on Monday and comes just a week after his meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Riyadh.

Delivering a message from the United States to Iran?

Iranian media, analysts, and the public have closely scrutinized recent visits by high-ranking foreign officials to Tehran, including Lavrov and the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, who met with Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei last week. These visits are widely interpreted as potential mediation efforts between Tehran and Washington or as channels for delivering messages from the Trump administration.

A commentary published Tuesday by Iran’s official news agency, IRNA, acknowledged that the purpose of Lavrov’s visit might extend beyond the official agenda. However, it argued that many experts doubt Lavrov is carrying a direct message from the Trump administration. Instead, it suggested that Lavrov might share his assessment of Washington’s approach to Iran and relay Iran’s desired roadmap back to the US in a similar manner.

The commentary also speculated that Lavrov could be conveying Moscow’s own message to Tehran, warning against shifting Iran’s nuclear doctrine or withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), as some Iranian ultra-hardliners advocate.

Speaking to the reformist Etemad daily, foreign policy analyst Abdolreza Faraji-Rad cast doubt on the likelihood of Lavrov delivering a direct US message to Tehran.

If such a message were being conveyed, he suggested it might involve Washington offering a temporary reduction in “maximum pressure” sanctions—reimposed by Trump’s executive order on January 20—in exchange for Iran agreeing to direct negotiations over its nuclear program.

Others suggested that Lavrov is simply planning to inform the Islamic Republic about its changing relations with the Trump administration and Ukraine negotiations.

Concerns about Iran being used by Russia as a bargaining chip

Some Iranian media and analysts warned that Iran could be betrayed by Russia and become a bargaining chip in potential negotiations between the Trump and Putin administrations, particularly regarding the Ukraine conflict.

A commentary published Tuesday by Khabar Online, a news outlet close to former conservative Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani, compared Lavrov’s recent meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and the planned Trump-Putin meeting compared by some to the Yalta Conference of February 1945, which reshaped global geopolitics. The article warned that “Iran is also in danger.”

Khabar Online also quoted former chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh, who argued that Iran is merely a bargaining chip in these negotiations. “I am concerned that Iran may be sacrificed for peace [in Ukraine],” he stated.

Reza Taghizadeh, a Glasgow-based Iranian political commentator, echoed similar concerns on X, speculating that “Lavrov's goal in Tehran is to convince the Islamic Republic to surrender its nuclear program and disband the ‘axis of resistance’ in exchange for avoiding an Israeli military attack and blocking [its] oil exports! … Are the Russians securing [concessions from the US over] Ukraine while offering up Iran [in return]?”