• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo
OPINION

Iran stuck in uncertainty as hardship mounts

Morad Vaisi
Morad Vaisi

Iran International political analyst

Jan 30, 2025, 08:52 GMT+0Updated: 11:46 GMT+0
People walk past a mural depicting the late leader of the Islamic Republic Ruhollah Khomeini and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on a building in a street in Tehran, Iran, October 7, 2024.
People walk past a mural depicting the late leader of the Islamic Republic Ruhollah Khomeini and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on a building in a street in Tehran, Iran, October 7, 2024.

Iran is in a state of limbo as no one can know whether the country is moving toward negotiations or war - a choice which rests with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

This unpredictability has stalled or significantly slowed many economic, political, and social developments. The only process that continues unabated is repression, restrictions, and the violation of citizens’ rights.

Meanwhile, President Masoud Pezeshkian, who remains loyal to Khamenei, has effectively become an even weaker version of his predecessors, Mohammad Khatami and Hassan Rouhani—a trajectory that is fueling growing public anger. Iranians are no longer merely dissatisfied; they are outraged, and this anger is evident in daily conversations.

Six months into Pezeshkian’s administration, no positive changes have taken place in the country, and all eyes are on the standoff between Khamenei and Donald Trump.

Khamenei’s recent remarks have done little to clarify the Islamic Republic’s path. Some analysts interpret his statements as a sign of readiness for negotiations, while others see them as a continuation of the regime’s anti-US policies.

This uncertainty has deepened the country’s economic stagnation, with repression being the only policy consistently pursued. Iran’s currency has lost more than 30% of its value since early September, and inflation of consumer good has spiked to 50%, based on media reports from Tehran.

At the same time, Trump’s stance on negotiations remains unclear. He may set conditions that the Islamic Republic finds difficult to accept. His broader Iran policy also remains ambiguous, with his only clear position being opposition to Iran acquiring nuclear weapons.

This prolonged state of anticipation and suspension has not only paralyzed key affairs but has also worsened the country’s economic crisis and living conditions.

Iran’s oil exports, already under heavy sanctions, continue covertly, but they are expected to decline with Trump’s return.

Meanwhile, much of the oil revenue is squandered by IRGC commanders and the ruling system's insiders.

The stock market, investments, and production remain in complete uncertainty, while prices for essential goods continue to rise. The dollar and gold coin exchange rates have reached record highs, while people struggle to afford basic necessities, including even potatoes and onions.

In this situation, many Iranians have concluded that whether negotiations take place or not, the Islamic Republic remains unbearable for them.

Years of negotiations, agreements, and repeated failures have left people exhausted and without hope for improvement. The past two decades have shown that regardless of the outcome of talks, their daily lives remain in crisis.

People now understand that a deal or no deal will make little difference in their fate. Even if sanctions ease and Iran resumes oil sales, the revenues will not benefit them. Instead, the money will either fund regional proxies like Hezbollah and Hamas or be used by officials to buy loyalty from security forces or be lost to corruption.

For this reason, many believe that reform is no longer possible and that the only solution is the end of the Islamic Republic. This sentiment is increasingly visible both in public discourse and online spaces.

For many, it no longer matters whether Iran-US negotiations succeed because past experience has proven that the Islamic Republic will not change. When weakened, it negotiates and compromises to ease international pressure; when strengthened, it resumes its aggressive policies.

This widespread distrust is the result of years of unfulfilled promises and the system’s exploitation of domestic and international crises.

Now, more than ever, people are both furious and disillusioned. This sentiment is resonating across society and is increasingly reflected in the sharper and more direct language used against Khamenei himself.

Most Viewed

Iran negotiators ordered to return after internal rift over Islamabad talks
1
EXCLUSIVE

Iran negotiators ordered to return after internal rift over Islamabad talks

2
ANALYSIS

US blockade enters murky phase as tankers spoof signals and buyers hesitate

3
ANALYSIS

Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth

4

US tightens financial squeeze on Iran, warns banks over oil money flows

5
ANALYSIS

US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Hardliners push Hormuz ‘red line’ as US blockade tests Iran’s leverage
    INSIGHT

    Hardliners push Hormuz ‘red line’ as US blockade tests Iran’s leverage

  • Ideology may be fading in Iran, but not in Kashmir's ‘Mini Iran'
    INSIGHT

    Ideology may be fading in Iran, but not in Kashmir's ‘Mini Iran'

  • War damage amounts to $3,000 per Iranian, with blockade set to add to losses
    INSIGHT

    War damage amounts to $3,000 per Iranian, with blockade set to add to losses

  • Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth
    ANALYSIS

    Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth

  • US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption
    ANALYSIS

    US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption

  • Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout
    INSIGHT

    Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout

•
•
•

More Stories

Iran aims for smart governance through AI, IRGC commander says

Jan 29, 2025, 12:45 GMT+0

Iran plans to use artificial intelligence to develop smart governance to secure a place among the world's top ten nations in the field, according to an IRGC commander.

Speaking at a conference in Tehran titled Artificial Intelligence and the Future Civilization on Wednesday, Mohammadreza Ahanger, the head of the Revolutionary Guard’s Imam Hossein University, also called for unified government control and strategic investment to achieve its goal.

He added that unified command is the most crucial factor for successful AI governance in Iran, requiring centralized responsibility within the government.

Iran has made limited practical advancements in artificial intelligence but has hosted several events focused on the technology's applications.

In July 2024, Iran established the National Artificial Intelligence Organization as an independent body under the president’s supervision. While its official charter is yet to be finalized, an initial document outlines Iran’s ambition to rank among the world’s top 10 AI leaders within the next decade.

Despite these aspirations, Iran ranked 94th out of 193 countries in the 2024 AI Readiness Index by Oxford Insights, which assesses governments' preparedness to implement AI in public services.

Meanwhile, the country's first artificial intelligence park is set to be established in Tehran within the next two years, according to an official from the Vice Presidency for Science, Technology, and Knowledge-Based Economy.

Top presidential aide calls to end US interference on Iran's foreign policy

Jan 29, 2025, 10:46 GMT+0

Iran's Vice-President for Strategic Affairs Javad Zarif criticized US influence on the country's foreign policy, calling it an obstacle that must be removed.

Speaking at a conference titled Prospects of Regional and Global Developments in the Trump Era in Tehran, Zarif said, "I do not view the United States as an opportunity for Iran's foreign policy; I see it as an obstacle."

The event, hosted by the Institute for Iran-Eurasia Studies (IRAS), brought together diplomats and analysts to examine the challenges posed by Trump-era policies.

Zarif argued that US President Donald Trump's focus on reviving hard power through economic pressure—such as tariffs and visa restrictions—was emblematic of his administration's approach to global dominance.

He added that Trump divided countries into "smaller nations that must show loyalty and peer nations that do not." This dynamic, he suggested, “weakened the notion of stable alliances, replacing them with temporary, issue-based coalitions."

For decades, Iran has labeled the US its enemy, citing a history of sanctions, intervention, and regime-change attempts. The two nations broke diplomatic ties in 1980.

Trump’s maximum pressure campaign marked a peak in hostility, with severe sanctions targeting Iran's economy. Yet Tehran claims to have withstood these efforts, portraying its survival as a defeat of Washington's regional ambitions.

Zarif also addressed perceptions of Iran’s weakened state, refuting that it posed a greater nuclear threat. "They argue that military action is the only way to stop Iran," he said, but added that Trump’s flexibility might leave room for negotiations.

He said that based on Trump's recent statements, the new US president's mind is subject to change.

"Trump does not have a solidified perspective in this area, and depending on the circumstances he finds himself in at any given moment, he is willing to adjust some of his paradigms," he added.

Tehran insiders see Trump 2.0 as more diplomatic than before

Jan 29, 2025, 09:35 GMT+0
•
Maryam Sinaiee

US President Donald Trump's latest remarks on Iran, which downplayed the likelihood of military conflict and suggested possible dialogue, have prompted some Tehran insiders to favor direct talks and a potential agreement with his administration.

“This time Trump is completely different from before. There were [people like] John Bolton and [Mike] Pompeo before and he had radicals [around him],” Ahmad Bakhshayesh-Ardestani, a member of the Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee told the Iranian Labour News Agency (ILNA) Tuesday.

Last week, President Trump expressed hope that a deal on Iran's nuclear program would eliminate the need for the US to support an Israeli attack on Iran.

"It would really be nice if that could be worked out without having to go that further step ... Iran hopefully will make a deal, and if they don't make a deal, I guess that's okay too," Trump said.

Last week, Trump terminated Secret Service protection for former national security advisor John Bolton, former secretary of state Mike Pompeo, and former special envoy for Iran Brian Hook, despite alleged threats from Iran against their lives. This decision has drawn criticism from some Republicans.

Bakhshayesh-Ardestani also argued that Trump’s approach and way of thinking about conflicts in the world have changed because he wants to tell the world that he has the power to go to war but wants to solve the problems without resorting to force.

He also argued that Trump has adopted a new approach to the Islamic Republic because he has realized that Iran does not seek a nuclear bomb. “Trump’s focus is on Iran for not having nuclear weapons. Iran considers nuclear weapons to be religiously forbidden,” he said, adding that this means an agreement between the two sides is possible.

He was apparently referring to an alleged fatwa by Supreme Leader Ali kHamenei many years ago. However, analysts argue that the so-called fatwa is merely an advisory opinion rather than a binding legal decree. They argue it was intended to mislead the international community about the true intentions of a nuclear program that Tehran insists is peaceful.

In late December, Bakhshayesh-Ardestani had said that an Israeli strike against Iran's nuclear facilities would effectively allow the Islamic Republic to move toward developing nuclear weapons.

Speaking to the moderate conservative Entekhab news website in Tehran on Monday, a former Iranian diplomat at the UN, Kourosh Ahmadi, described “the tone and content of the words that Trump has spoken about Iran after taking office” as “more diplomatic than hostile.”

“Firstly, he has only talked about negotiation and agreement [with Iran], and secondly, his tone is mostly calm and there is no threatening rhetoric,” he said.

Ahmadi suggested that Trump's stance has increased the likelihood that he plans to "officially propose negotiations as the first step in relations with Iran, rather than focusing on threats or pressure."

The former diplomat also advised Iranian authorities to view Trump’s statements as an indication of his openness to negotiating with Tehran before exploring other options.

President Masoud Pezeshkian and officials of his administration including Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi say Tehran is open to and prepared for talks with the Trump administration, but it is unclear to what extent they are willing to be flexible. Trump also has not officially reveal his next steps toward Tehran.

Other Iranian officials, including Pezeshkian’s Special Envoy in Maritime Economy, Ali Abdolalizadeh, have in recent weeks indicated that the “governance” has concluded that there must be direct talks between the US and Iran.

In the parlance of the Islamic Republic, terms like "governance" or "system" are frequently used to refer to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. In 2018, Khamenei stated that the Islamic Republic would never engage in negotiations with the US, specifically not with the Trump administration.

In mid-January, a senior figure in Khamenei’s office claimed that the Supreme Leader’s anti-American remarks in a speech were not meant to rule out negotiations if the positions of the two sides of a dispute align.

Iran says it has not received any messages from Trump

Jan 29, 2025, 08:45 GMT+0

Iran's president says the Islamic Republic has not received any messages from US President Donald Trump yet.

Asked by reporters about receiving a message from Trump, President Masoud Pezeshkian said, "No, we have not received any messages yet."

Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also told reporters that there has been no communication with Trump. "No specific message has been sent or received."

Speaking after a cabinet meeting in Tehran, he talked of the erosion of trust after past agreements were broken.

"We had previously reached an agreement, but they broke the agreement, and now the basis is distrust," he said.

Iran engaged in 18 months of indirect negotiations with the Biden administration between 2021 and 2022 to restore the United States’ participation in the JCPOA after Trump unilaterally exited the agreement in 2018, imposing harsh sanctions on Iran. However, the Vienna talks ended without a deal, particularly after Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The conflict raised questions about whether Tehran genuinely sought an agreement or aimed to ease sanctions.

Deputy Foreign Minister for Political Affairs, Majid Takht-Ravanchi, said on Monday that Tehran is consulting on President Donald Trump's policies toward Iran and has developed strategies and plans to address them.

Takht-Ravanchi said that Iran will not engage in negotiations on issues beyond its nuclear program, potentially referencing US demands for Tehran to end its involvement in regional affairs.

Domestically, parliamentary committee member Fada-Hossein Maleki said that Iran is not authorized to engage directly with the US, maintaining only mediated channels.

Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, on Tuesday called on Iranian officials to remain vigilant about their adversaries when engaging in negotiations and to approach agreements with caution. His cryptic remarks have been interpreted by some as a subtle endorsement of talks with the United States.

"Behind the smiles of diplomacy, there are always hidden and malicious enmities and resentments. We must open our eyes and be careful with whom we are dealing, trading, and talking," Khamenei said at a gathering of top military and political figures.

Ali Khamenei has served as the supreme authority of the Islamic Republic for the majority of its nearly 46-year history, wielding ultimate decision-making power.

Iranian foreign minister’s visit to Afghanistan sparks controversy

Jan 28, 2025, 18:05 GMT+0
•
Maryam Sinaiee

Iranian media and political commentators have criticized Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi’s official visit to Kabul on Sunday, arguing that Tehran has not yet formally recognized the Taliban government.

In a Monday article, reformist publication Etemad Online questioned the rationale behind the visit, arguing that while neighboring countries are a priority in foreign policy, visiting a nation whose government Tehran has not recognized raises significant concerns. The article noted that the trip took place “despite warnings from experts.”

The caretaker of Iran's embassy in Kabul, Alireza Bigdeli, declined to confirm whether Araghchi’s visit signified recognition of the Taliban regime. “Recognition [of a government’s legitimacy] is a process grounded in international law with its own specific criteria,” he said, asserting the distinction between diplomatic engagement and formal recognition.

On Saturday, the conservative newspaper Jomhouri Eslami had urged Araghchi to cancel the trip, citing unresolved issues such as disputes over water rights between Tehran and Kabul, border violations by the Taliban, the influx of illegal immigrants into Iran, and Taliban support for terrorist groups.

The newspaper warned that attempting to address these issues during the visit was “only an illusion” and predicted the visit would yield no tangible benefits.

In a harshly worded commentary published Monday, Jomhouri Eslami criticized the visit, calling the Taliban an “insurgent, violent, and backward group.” The article also questioned whether the Taliban merited attention from the Iranian Foreign Minister and accused proponents of the visit of either misunderstanding the region or prioritizing personal agendas over Iran’s national interests.

Ali Bigdeli, a senior foreign policy expert, also expressed skepticism in an interview with the Fararu news website. He argued that Araghchi didn't have to travel to Kabul to address Iran’s water rights regarding the Helmand River or recent tensions with Afghanistan. Bigdeli suggested that Iran could have invited a high-ranking Afghan delegation to Tehran instead.

Notably, the leader of the Taliban, Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada, did not meet with the Iranian foreign minister during his one-day visit.

Araghchi stated that Afghan officials had pledged to honor their obligations regarding Iran’s share of the Helmand River water, framing it as both “human and religious duties.”

While some media outlets were critical, others offered a more positive assessment of the visit.

Khabar Online, a platform affiliated with former Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani, highlighted potential economic and political benefits. The outlet also discussed the opportunity to resolve longstanding water disputes, which, if left unaddressed, could trigger mass migration from Iran’s southeastern province of Sistan and Baluchestan.

“Experts in international relations believe that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, recognizing Afghanistan’s geopolitical significance, is prioritizing trade and security to align Afghan authorities’ political behavior with Iran’s national interests,” the outlet's report noted.

During his visit, Araghchi expressed Tehran's eagerness to boost imports from Afghanistan in order to establish a more balanced trade relationship. Currently, Afghanistan imports oil, gas, food products, construction materials, agricultural machinery, and petrochemical goods from Iran.

According to Afghanistan’s Ministry of Industries and Trade, bilateral trade grew by 84% in 2024, reaching $3.197 billion.