• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

WSJ Slams Reported US Plans For A Limited Deal With Iran

Jun 17, 2023, 10:28 GMT+1Updated: 12:07 GMT+1
President Joe Biden greets Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT), a supporter of the Iran nuclear deal, on June 16, 2023
President Joe Biden greets Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT), a supporter of the Iran nuclear deal, on June 16, 2023

The Wall Street Editorial Board has slammed reported plans by the Biden administration to reach a limited nuclear deal with Iran in exchange for billions of dollars.

In an editorial on Friday, WSJ said the reported deal taking shape is not what President Joe Biden promised when he embarked on talks with the Islamic Republic in early 2021.

Biden had promised a “longer and stronger” agreement, the Journal said, “Now, in a remarkable retreat, the Biden Administration is pursuing an unwritten ‚understanding‘ with Iran to get to the brink of a nuclear breakout but go no further.“

The Biden administration has denied any deals with Iran, acknowledging that contacts were made to convey US demands. The latest denial came from Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Friday during a press conference.

“With regard to Iran, some of the reports that we’ve seen about an agreement on nuclear matters or, for that matter, on detainees are simply not accurate and not true,” Blinken said.

The WSJ says that in the deal taking shape Iran will keep all of its 60-percent enriched uranium, without clarity about international monitoring of its nuclear activities, while Tehran can break the unwritten “understanding” over any issue in the future.

The editorial also criticized a deal earlier this month that allows Iraq to release $2.7 billion of Iran’s frozen funds ostensibly for spending mainly on food imports.

"The Administration says Iran will spend the Iraqi funds only on food and medicine, as if money isn’t fungible. In reality the U.S. is freeing up billions of dollars that will finance the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its imperialism across the Middle East," the editorial said.

Most Viewed

Washington’s economic war on Iran starts in Dubai, not Beijing
1
ANALYSIS

Washington’s economic war on Iran starts in Dubai, not Beijing

2

Iranian banks remain open in UAE as US campaign squeezes Dubai trade - FT

3
ANALYSIS

What the US-Venezuela oil model could mean for Iran’s energy future

4

Iran sanctions reach education: Duolingo blocked, TOEFL and GRE in doubt

5
PODCAST

Iran’s political prisoners are being executed. Why is supporting them controversial?

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • What the US-Venezuela oil model could mean for Iran’s energy future
    ANALYSIS

    What the US-Venezuela oil model could mean for Iran’s energy future

  • Washington’s economic war on Iran starts in Dubai, not Beijing
    ANALYSIS

    Washington’s economic war on Iran starts in Dubai, not Beijing

  • Iran’s political prisoners are being executed. Why is supporting them controversial?
    PODCAST

    Iran’s political prisoners are being executed. Why is supporting them controversial?

  • Iran’s missing fuel: Can border smuggling explain it all?
    ANALYSIS

    Iran’s missing fuel: Can border smuggling explain it all?

  • Iran bets on China to blunt Trump’s economic offensive
    INSIGHT

    Iran bets on China to blunt Trump’s economic offensive

  • Iran or the dollar? US makes an example of Banque Misr
    ANALYSIS

    Iran or the dollar? US makes an example of Banque Misr

  • War or deal? Rezaei begins to define Iran’s price
    ANALYSIS

    War or deal? Rezaei begins to define Iran’s price

Banner