Ultraconservative Iran Lawmaker Lashes Raisi For Nepotism, Blunders

The vague report first by state media, was followed by a Revolutionary Guard statement repeating the media report with little details added, such as which vessels were involved.

The report said that the US Navy stopped a tanker carrying Iranian oil and transferred the cargo to another vessel. However, The Revolutionary Guard using helicopter landing seized that tanker and brought it back to Iranian territorial waters.

"With the timely and authoritative action of the Guards naval forces, the US terrorist Navy's operation to steal Iranian oil in the Sea of Oman failed," Iran's Guards said.

The IRGC said the incident took place on October 25.

Reuters reported that US officials speaking on condition of anonymity said that the Iranian report was not true and there had been no US attempt to seize a tanker.

The American officials said that in reality Iranian forces had seized a Vietnamese-flagged oil tanker last month and US naval forces were just monitoring the situation.

The report further claimed that the US Navy tried to intervene and stop the movement of the vessel by using helicopters and warships but “with the decisive intervention of IRGC” forces were unable to block the tanker’s route.

The United States or regional countries have not reported any incident recently.

The latest maritime incident dates to August 3, when Reuters quoted three “maritime security forces” as saying “Iranian-backed forces” had seized a tanker off the coast of UAE. The vessel was identified as the Panama-registered Asphalt Princess. One day later, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO), the Royal Navy information service for shipping, reported that a potential hijack incident off the coast of the United Arab Emirates was “complete,” suggesting boarders had left the tanker.

The Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh, at the time said Iran was “ready to deliver help and to provide a close investigation of the matter.” He implied that recent incidents with shipping in the Gulf of Oman and the Persian Gulf were “very suspicious.” Iran's senior armed forces spokesman, Abolfazl Shekarchi on the same day the incident was reported criticized "a kind of psychological warfare…setting the stage for new bouts of adventurism.”

The IRGC said video evidence of the alleged incident will be issued as the nature of the incident remains shrouded in mystery.

Iran has been shipping oil to Asian destinations despite US sanctions. China has increased its crude imports from Iran, although the cargoes are not officially registered as having originated in Iran.

The Trump administration seized a large shipment of Iranian fuel to Venezuela in August 2020, saying that the cargo belonged to the IRGC, a designated terrorist organization. The fuel was later sold on the open market.

Tensions are high in the region as nuclear negotiations with Iran are at an impasse, with Tehran having so far not returned to multilateral talks in Vienna suspended since June.

The US flew a B-1B bomber over the Middle East on Saturday, which was the first flyover since the Trump administration sent B-52 bombers several times into the region.

Allied fighter planes, including from Israel, escorted the B-1B bomber. Biden sending a B1-B bomber into the region allows him to send "a clear message of reassurance" to regional allies, the US Air Force's Central Command said in a Twitter post.

Updated at 19:09 GMT

Iranian Labour News Agency, ILNA, on Tuesday quoted Reza Mir-Tajeddini, a conservative member of Iran’s parliament as saying, "Not only the Majles is not after restricting Internet access, but even the ban on social media platform Twitter should be lifted as revolutionaries can spread our message in the world using the platform."

The comment by Mir Tajeddini was in sharp contrast to remarks by the staunchest opponent of social media at the Iranian parliament Morteza Agha-Tehrani who happens to be the former leader of ultraconservative Paydari Party holding the majority at the conservative-dominated parliament.

Agha Tehrani said last week that over 20,000 Iranians have cursed him for his opposition to social media, adding that he would try to further the legislation and have foreign social media banned even if 80 million Iranians oppose him.

Mir-Tajeddini, on the other hand, said on Tuesday, "Why should Twitter be banned in Iran when the country's officials are using it? If it is bad, it should be banned for everyone, but now that the officials are using it, everyone else should also have access to the platform."

Mir-Tajeddini was alluding to the fact that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has several Twitter accounts in various languages, and other civilian officials and military commanders including President Ebrahim Raisi, Judiciary Chief Ghiolamhossein Ejei, Majles Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and national security chief Ali Shamkhani also use Twitter and other social media platforms for their messaging.

Mir-Tajeddini further stressed at the bans on other social media platforms should also be lifted. He said different ideas are being put forward on social media and there are so many insightful cultural figures in Iran who can remove possible doubts and answer possible questions. Facebook and You Tube are also blocked in Iran

Hardliners in Iran including Khamenei have spoken against free access to social media and have said that they should be regulated.

Iran during the past years has banned all major social media apps in Iran except Instagram where some 22 million Iranians are reportedly active. More than twice as much Iranian accounts are active on Telegram where sending video, audio and text is much easier. Telegram is also blocked but people use VPNs to connect.

Following the bans on most social media platforms after 2017, the Iranian government spent hefty budgets to develop its own homegrown applications. But Iranians did not trust government-made apps fearing surveillance and invasion of their privacy by security agencies.

On the other hand, homegrown applications have proven to be ineffective as they cannot support more than a few thousand users at any given time. Furthermore, they cannot facilitate cultural and scientific exchanges with the outside world.

The bigger concern on the part of more open-minded conservatives such as Mr. Mir-Tajeddini is that by restricting access to popular social media platforms such as Twitter, Telegram, Instagram and Facebook, Iranians are not likely to turn to Iran's own heavily restricted television and other media outlets that have been losing their audiences to foreign-based satellite television. This group of conservatives are probably concerned that in the absence of social media, the shaping of public opinion in Iran will fall totally into the hands of foreign-based satellite television channels whose sharp disagreement with the party-line in Iran is more than obvious and Iran's state-run TV cannot compete with those networks in terms of uncensored news and quality entertainment.

There are no details about what targets were hit, but past attacks have aimed at destroying weapons and ammunition depots belonging to Iran-backed forces. Also, weapons destined for the Lebanese Hezbollah have been a prime target for Israeli attacks in the past four year.

Israel does not comment about attacks in Syria.

Recent reports have said Iran is transferring surface-to-air missiles and attack drones to Syria, training militia forces under its command to use the drones. Last month, suspected Iranian drones hit a US base in southern Syria, in what could be seen as an escalation of Iranian sponsored attacks against US forces.

Israeli media say that the use of surface-to-surface missiles instead of aircraft could be a sign of an agreement with Russia not to expose the weakness of Russian air defense systems provided to Syria. The Russian air defense systems have not harmed or stopped Israeli air attacks since 2017.

The attack took place just after midnight, local time, but Syria has said another attack on Saturday was also conducted with surface-to-surface missiles.

Israeli media report quoting sources that Bennett had many productive meetings during the world climate summit in Glasgow, where other leaders were interested to know Israel’s opinion about how to deal with Iran and its analysis on Tehran’s intentions.

The Israeli prime minister had long talks with French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. The Times of Israel reported that discussions about Iran revolved two major issues – “what world powers can do to change Iranian behavior, and what Israel is doing independently.”

Iran suspended negotiations with world powers in June and has not returned to Vienna where six rounds of talks took place starting in April. Iran’s new hardline government is increasingly adopting a tougher posture that intends to change what was already agreed and perhaps even the established process whereby the United States was negotiation indirectly with the Iranian delegation.

A source told The Times of Israel that “There is a feeling in the world something has to happen,” and other countries want to know what Israel thinks.

Israeli media are also reporting that Bennet advised other leaders to be tough with Tehran, while most are thinking to use the traditional carrot and stick approach to coax Iran to play by diplomatic rules and reach an agreement on reestablishing limits to its nuclear program.

Meanwhile Bennett tried to solidify Israel’s strengthening ties with regional and Asian countries. He accepted an invitation to visit India and he invited Bahrain’s Salman Al Khalifa to visit Israel, an invitation he accepted.

Jerusalem Post reported that Bennett told world leaders to put more pressure on Iran, taking a hard line in the UN Security Council and in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Iran has reduced its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog this year but Western countries decided in the September meeting of the agency’s board of governors not to table a censure against Iran.

Bennett also reiterated Israel’s argument that without a firm plan to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons it would be a mistake to lift sanctions, giving Tehran a financial lifeline that it can use to finance its malign activities in the region.

US officials believe a drone attack in October on a US base in southern Syria was supported and “encouraged” by Iran, and last Friday the Treasury Department announced sanctions against Iranian officials and entities that assist its military drone program.

The Soufan Center, a counterterrorism and anti-extremism think tank reported on Tuesday that Iran is increasingly willing “to take direct military action against its adversaries” and force the US out of Iraq and Syria to be able to have free access for resupplying Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The report said, “It can be argued that the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in August has led Iranian leaders to assess that direct U.S. military pressure can compel the United States to withdraw from the region completely.”

Javan newspaper affiliated to the Revolutionary Guards, called the ambassador Yun Kang-hyeon’s action “cheap and shameless” on its frontpage, reflecting anger at South Korean banks holding up billions in payments owed to Iran due to fear of punitive United States action.

The Persian word the paper used means 'rotten' or 'putrid'.

While several papers, and many prominent citizens, criticized Yun for insensitivity, Javan in a commentary condemned "a conspiracy" targeting the "honor of a nation." The newspaper insisted that "expulsion of the putrid ambassador of South Korea" would be an insufficient response to such "shamelessness."

"How many million dollars are you charging the Iranian people for each mask?" Javan asked.

Vatan-e Emrouz, another principlist newspaper, used a headline "Charity of Thieves" on its front page alongside a photograph of ambassador and a box of donated masks. Principlist media also slammed Atieh hospital, one of the most expensive private hospital in Tehran, for accepting the gift.

Two Korean banks are holding billions owed to Iran in payment for oil shipments supplied before United States president Donald Trump in May 2019 extended US threats to take action against any third party buying Iranian oil or dealing with its financial sector. South Korea stopped buying Iranian oil, and despite entreaties from Tehran has not released the assets.

Iran foreign ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh Monday called the donations of masks “a joke” and demanded South Korea unfreeze Iran's assets, which have been estimated at $7 billion.

Iran's foreign minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian said October 2 that that the US should make a goodwill gesture − before talks resume to revive Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – by ‘unfreezing’ $10 billion in Iranian funds. This amounted to a request for Washington to state it would take no punitive action against a named third party or parties transferring money owed to Tehran, which could include payments owed by South Korea.

In a tweet Monday, the South Korean embassy listed its donations to Iran since the beginning of the Covid pandemic, including 1 million doses of AstraZeneca in October, 1 million masks in June, PCR test kits worth $2 million in May, and $1 million-worth of medicine for rare medical conditions in February 2020.

Jamshid Barzgar, a London-based journalist, said all the criticism of the South Korean ambassador was “populistic” and motivated simply by wanting to have Iran’s assets unfrozen. He told Iran International it was “selective” to ignore Korea’s recent donation of 1 million vaccine doses and “blow up out of proportion” the 2,000 masks.

After a letter from Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei September 6, President Ebrahim Raisi (Raeesi) instructed ministers not to allow imports from South Korea’s LG and Samsung. While Khamenei framed the letter as a way to boost local manufacturers, state media also described the move as a diplomatic message to South Korea.